User talk:Noblewikicause

Welcome!

Hello, Noblewikicause! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Blue Rasberry 16:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Subramanian Swamy appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 13:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Subramanian Swamy, you may be blocked from editing. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 17:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Sonia Gandhi

In answer to your question (which you put in the edit summary instead of the talk page) in Sonia Gandhi, Wikipedia is not an index of all the controversies a person has been linked with. The Wikipedia community treats its Biographies of Living persons very sensitively. There has been debate on whether the Controversies/Criticism section should be included explicitly or not. See WP:CSECTION for this. The general opinion is that the criticism should be integrated into the body of the article, rather than having a separate section. For examples of articles where the criticism has been integrated, see Yeddyurappa and Jawaharlal Nehru, which are two articles where I have integrated the criticism into the article. Hope this answers your questions. Contact me on User talk:MikeLynch if you need to contact me. Have a good day. TheMike •^{Leave me a message!} 07:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The discussion on whether the contraversies should be integrated with body or in a seperate section is a different debate. As far as this particular edit is concerned, New york times advertisement has been one of the biggest contraversies after bofors and foreign birth. And talking about presentation, my personal opinion would be to have a seperate section as its more readable, presentable and structured. However if wiki guidelines follow the concept of having it with body, will be more than willing to confirm to the standards.

OK. Please start a discussion on the talk page of the article, so that other editors can put in their thoughts. TheMike •^{Leave me a message!} 14:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)